LTMCF
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
88.31M
LYSCF
Price
$9.37
Change
-$0.24 (-2.50%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.28B
86 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTMCF vs LYSCF

Header iconLTMCF vs LYSCF Comparison
Open Charts LTMCF vs LYSCFBanner chart's image
Lithium Chile
Price$0.42
Change-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Volume$37.01K
Capitalization88.31M
Lynas Rare Earths
Price$9.37
Change-$0.24 (-2.50%)
Volume$58.17K
Capitalization9.28B
LTMCF vs LYSCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTMCF vs. LYSCF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTMCF is a Hold and LYSCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LTMCF: $0.42 vs. LYSCF: $9.37)
Brand notoriety: LTMCF and LYSCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTMCF: 269% vs. LYSCF: 46%
Market capitalization -- LTMCF: $88.31M vs. LYSCF: $9.28B
LTMCF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $88.31M. LYSCF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTMCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLYSCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LTMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LYSCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LYSCF is a better buy in the long-term than LTMCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTMCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYSCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LTMCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • LYSCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LYSCF is a better buy in the short-term than LTMCF.

Price Growth

LTMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -3.49% price change this week, while LYSCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYSCF is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYSCF($9.28B) has a higher market cap than LTMCF($88.3M). LYSCF has higher P/E ratio than LTMCF: LYSCF (1684.50) vs LTMCF (58.58). LYSCF YTD gains are higher at: 133.666 vs. LTMCF (-21.898). LYSCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 101M vs. LTMCF (-3.02M). LYSCF has higher revenues than LTMCF: LYSCF (482M) vs LTMCF (0).
LTMCFLYSCFLTMCF / LYSCF
Capitalization88.3M9.28B1%
EBITDA-3.02M101M-3%
Gain YTD-21.898133.666-16%
P/E Ratio58.581684.503%
Revenue0482M-
Total Cash1.07MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTMCF vs LYSCF: Fundamental Ratings
LTMCF
LYSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7030
SMR RATING
1..100
6587
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LTMCF's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSCF (98). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTMCF (70). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LTMCF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as LYSCF (87). This means that LTMCF’s stock grew similarly to LYSCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as LTMCF (58). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

LYSCF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as LTMCF (11). This means that LYSCF’s stock grew similarly to LTMCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTMCFLYSCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LYSCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMCS31.990.33
+1.04%
Xtrackers MSCI EMs Climate Selection ETF
AVDV86.300.69
+0.81%
Avantis International Small Cap Val ETF
SMDV68.790.06
+0.09%
ProShares Russell 2000 Dividend Growers
OVL50.63-0.12
-0.23%
Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF
CIF1.75-0.01
-0.57%
MFS Intermediate High Income Fund

LTMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTMCF and PILBF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTMCF and PILBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTMCF
1D Price
Change %
LTMCF100%
-1.30%
PILBF - LTMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
PMETF - LTMCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.87%
GLCNF - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
GLNCY - LTMCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
LYSCF - LTMCF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
More

LYSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LYSCF has been closely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LYSCF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LYSCF
1D Price
Change %
LYSCF100%
-2.55%
LYSDY - LYSCF
88%
Closely correlated
-2.60%
BDNNY - LYSCF
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
GLNCY - LYSCF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
PILBF - LYSCF
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
GLCNF - LYSCF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More