Advertisement
LTM vs LUV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTM is a Buy and LUV is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LTM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLUV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LTM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- LUV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LTM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LUV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LTM (@Airlines) experienced а +4.32% price change this week, while LUV (@Airlines) price change was +8.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
LTM is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.
LUV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Airlines (+2.06% weekly)Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.
| LTM | LUV | LTM / LUV | |
| Capitalization | 12.6B | 19.4B | 65% |
| EBITDA | 1.87B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 56.832 | 2.557 | 2,223% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.75 | 38.29 | 31% |
| Revenue | 12.9B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 2.21B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.09B | 8B | 89% |
LTM | LUV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 23 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 78 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LUV's Valuation (65) in the Airlines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LTM (99). This means that LUV’s stock grew somewhat faster than LTM’s over the last 12 months.
LTM's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Airlines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LUV (100). This means that LTM’s stock grew significantly faster than LUV’s over the last 12 months.
LTM's SMR Rating (12) in the Airlines industry is significantly better than the same rating for LUV (82). This means that LTM’s stock grew significantly faster than LUV’s over the last 12 months.
LUV's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as LTM (40). This means that LUV’s stock grew similarly to LTM’s over the last 12 months.
LUV's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Airlines industry is in the same range as LTM (98). This means that LUV’s stock grew similarly to LTM’s over the last 12 months.
| LTM | LUV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 59% | 19 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GVIP | 138.52 | 1.10 | +0.80% |
| Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF | |||
| VWID | 31.97 | 0.05 | +0.15% |
| Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF | |||
| IPAC | 68.60 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF | |||
| KLIP | 31.57 | -0.11 | -0.33% |
| KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strat ETF | |||
| BABO | 14.71 | -0.20 | -1.34% |
| YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
LTM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LTM and AFLYY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTM and AFLYY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTM | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| AFLYY - LTM | 17% Poorly correlated | +4.24% | ||
| LUV - LTM | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
| ULCC - LTM | 15% Poorly correlated | +3.49% | ||
| VLRS - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.21% | ||
| SNCY - LTM | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
More | ||||
LUV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUV has been loosely correlated with UAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LUV jumps, then UAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LUV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUV | 100% | +0.26% | ||
| UAL - LUV | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| SKYW - LUV | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| DAL - LUV | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| AAL - LUV | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| ALGT - LUV | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.05% | ||
More | ||||