It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LTH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LTH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XPOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
LTH (@Recreational Products) experienced а +1.60% price change this week, while XPOF (@Recreational Products) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.02%.
LTH is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2026.
XPOF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2026.
The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| LTH | XPOF | LTH / XPOF | |
| Capitalization | 5.62B | 223M | 2,518% |
| EBITDA | 680M | -19.05M | -3,570% |
| Gain YTD | 17.179 | -52.639 | -33% |
| P/E Ratio | 19.90 | 26.61 | 75% |
| Revenue | 2.82B | 317M | 891% |
| Total Cash | 176M | 21.7M | 811% |
| Total Debt | 4.09B | 389M | 1,050% |
| LTH | XPOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OGMNX | 51.48 | 1.57 | +3.15% |
| Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R | |||
| CFIHX | 80.71 | 0.40 | +0.50% |
| American Funds Capital Income Bldr F3 | |||
| GSUSX | 58.03 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Goldman Sachs US Equity Insights C | |||
| MUOIX | 34.81 | N/A | N/A |
| Morgan Stanley Instl US Core I | |||
| SAREX | 11.48 | -0.10 | -0.86% |
| SA Real Estate Securities | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LTH has been loosely correlated with OSW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LTH jumps, then OSW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LTH | 100% | +0.86% | ||
| OSW - LTH | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| PLNT - LTH | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| AS - LTH | 43% Loosely correlated | +3.98% | ||
| PTON - LTH | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| MSGE - LTH | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that XPOF and JAKK have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XPOF and JAKK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XPOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPOF | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| JAKK - XPOF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| FNKO - XPOF | 27% Poorly correlated | +4.24% | ||
| LTH - XPOF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
| HAS - XPOF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
| AOUT - XPOF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
More | ||||