LTGHY
Price
$2.60
Change
+$0.06 (+2.36%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
948.61M
MFCSF
Price
$10.67
Change
-$0.04 (-0.37%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
199.05M
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LTGHY vs MFCSF

Header iconLTGHY vs MFCSF Comparison
Open Charts LTGHY vs MFCSFBanner chart's image
Life Healthcare Group Holdings
Price$2.60
Change+$0.06 (+2.36%)
Volume$428.44K
Capitalization948.61M
Medical Facilities
Price$10.67
Change-$0.04 (-0.37%)
Volume$300
Capitalization199.05M
LTGHY vs MFCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LTGHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LTGHY vs. MFCSF commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTGHY is a Buy and MFCSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (LTGHY: $2.60 vs. MFCSF: $10.67)
Brand notoriety: LTGHY and MFCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hospital/Nursing Management industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LTGHY: 503% vs. MFCSF: 10%
Market capitalization -- LTGHY: $948.61M vs. MFCSF: $199.05M
LTGHY [@Hospital/Nursing Management] is valued at $948.61M. MFCSF’s [@Hospital/Nursing Management] market capitalization is $199.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry ranges from $95.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hospital/Nursing Management] industry is $4.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LTGHY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMFCSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LTGHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MFCSF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFCSF is a better buy in the long-term than LTGHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LTGHY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFCSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LTGHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MFCSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LTGHY is a better buy in the short-term than MFCSF.

Price Growth

LTGHY (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а +26.76% price change this week, while MFCSF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +109.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFCSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hospital/Nursing Management (+2.92% weekly)

Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LTGHY($949M) has a higher market cap than MFCSF($199M). LTGHY has higher P/E ratio than MFCSF: LTGHY (10.51) vs MFCSF (5.73). LTGHY YTD gains are higher at: 24.856 vs. MFCSF (-0.869).
LTGHYMFCSFLTGHY / MFCSF
Capitalization949M199M477%
EBITDAN/A81.5M-
Gain YTD24.856-0.869-2,860%
P/E Ratio10.515.73183%
RevenueN/A330M-
Total CashN/A49M-
Total DebtN/A67.6M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LTGHY vs MFCSF: Fundamental Ratings
LTGHY
MFCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
203
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4924
SMR RATING
1..100
9713
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6160
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6498
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LTGHY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as MFCSF (11). This means that LTGHY’s stock grew similarly to MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as LTGHY (49). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LTGHY’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for LTGHY (97). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew significantly faster than LTGHY’s over the last 12 months.

MFCSF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as LTGHY (61). This means that MFCSF’s stock grew similarly to LTGHY’s over the last 12 months.

LTGHY's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFCSF (98). This means that LTGHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LTGHYMFCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LTGHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIGRX24.430.12
+0.49%
Gabelli International Growth AAA
DCLVX19.80-0.02
-0.10%
Dunham Large Cap Value C
TEMRX9.91-0.01
-0.10%
Nuveen Emerging Markets Eq A
AWSRX17.55-0.07
-0.40%
Invesco Global Core Equity R
MITJX36.82-0.22
-0.59%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr R6

LTGHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LTGHY and CCRN have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LTGHY and CCRN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LTGHY
1D Price
Change %
LTGHY100%
+2.36%
CCRN - LTGHY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
NVLPF - LTGHY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KJFI - LTGHY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - LTGHY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWKHY - LTGHY
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MFCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MFCSF and LWSCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MFCSF and LWSCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFCSF
1D Price
Change %
MFCSF100%
N/A
LWSCF - MFCSF
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
ORPEF - MFCSF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KJFI - MFCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RAFLF - MFCSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTGHY - MFCSF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+2.36%
More