Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMFCX
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$21.71
Change+$0.44 (+2.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.12
Change+$1.05 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LTFOX (6.62B). RMFCX (1.24) and LTFOX (1.19) have matching dividends . LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LTFOX (9 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LTFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LTFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.96 vs. RMFCX (7.92). LTFOX (48.12) and RMFCX (45.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMFCX | LTFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.841 | 3.910 | 175% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.24 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.96 | 7.92 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.35 | 30.30 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.12 | 45.96 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.99 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers