Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMFCX
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$21.00
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LTFOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LTFOX (6.32B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LTFOX (1.56) vs RMFCX (1.20). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LTFOX (9 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LTFOX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX (4.96) and LTFOX (4.85) have marching annual gain over last year. LTFOX (57.58) and RMFCX (57.10) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMFCX | LTFOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.91 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.466 | 13.689 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.20 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 4.96 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 38.79 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.58 | 57.10 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers