Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$20.45
Change-$0.10 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. LTFOX (6.24B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.65) vs RMEBX (1.11). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LTFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. RMEBX (7.63). LTFOX (55.24) and RMEBX (53.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.164 | 10.612 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 110B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.11 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.73 | 7.63 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.38 | 22.19 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.24 | 53.85 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.43 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers