Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$21.00
Change+$0.08 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LTFOX (6.32B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.56) vs RMEBX (1.05). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LTFOX (4.85) and RMEBX (4.81) have marching annual gain over last year. LTFOX (57.58) and RMEBX (55.95) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.466 | 13.527 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 1.05 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 4.81 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 38.19 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.58 | 55.95 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement