Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LTFOX vs RMEBX
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LTFOX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated F3
Price$20.19
Change+$0.13 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LTFOX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LTFOX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LTFOX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LTFOX (6.22B). LTFOX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LTFOX (1.67) vs RMEBX (1.12). LTFOX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LTFOX (8 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LTFOX (0.39). LTFOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LTFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LTFOX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. LTFOX (10.76). LTFOX return over 5 years is better than : 64.12 vs. RMEBX (60.65).
| LTFOX | RMEBX | LTFOX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.776 | 9.495 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.12 | 149% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.76 | 11.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.82 | 28.70 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.12 | 60.65 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.57 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement