Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSV Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$19.97
Change+$0.30 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets579.84M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSVQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSVQX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. LSVQX (580M). LSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: LSVQX (1.63) vs SSGSX (0.48). LSVQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSVQX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LSVQX (0.83). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. LSVQX (25.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSVQX: SSGSX (2500) vs LSVQX (100000). LSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.02 vs. SSGSX (-12.24). LSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 65.11 vs. SSGSX (3.18).
| LSVQX | SSGSX | LSVQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.539 | 1.680 | 449% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 580M | 5.18B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.48 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.02 | -12.24 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.42 | -6.64 | -337% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.11 | 3.18 | 2,045% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.02 | 18.79 | 426% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement