Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSV Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$20.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets596.01M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.60
Change+$0.44 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.29B
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSVQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSVQX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.29B vs. LSVQX (596M). LSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: LSVQX (1.63) vs SSGSX (0.48). LSVQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSVQX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LSVQX (0.83). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. LSVQX (25.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSVQX: SSGSX (2500) vs LSVQX (100000). LSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.42 vs. SSGSX (-8.83). LSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 71.39 vs. SSGSX (6.40).
| LSVQX | SSGSX | LSVQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.447 | 4.674 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 596M | 5.29B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.48 | 343% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.42 | -8.83 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.56 | -1.03 | -2,860% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.39 | 6.40 | 1,115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.34 | 29.48 | 327% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers