Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSV Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$19.24
Change-$0.17 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets569.47M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSVQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSVQX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. LSVQX (569M). LSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: LSVQX (1.69) vs SSGSX (0.49). LSVQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSVQX (13 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LSVQX (0.83). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. LSVQX (25.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSVQX: SSGSX (2500) vs LSVQX (100000). LSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.35 vs. SSGSX (-13.37). LSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 74.98 vs. SSGSX (7.38).
| LSVQX | SSGSX | LSVQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.26 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.608 | -1.357 | -266% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 569M | 5.23B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 0.49 | 348% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.35 | -13.37 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.18 | -6.72 | -315% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.98 | 7.38 | 1,016% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.42 | 17.58 | 435% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement