Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSVQX vs SSGSX
LSV Small Cap Value Institutional
Price$18.86
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets584.79M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
LSVQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSVQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSVQX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. LSVQX (585M). LSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: LSVQX (1.77) vs SSGSX (0.51). LSVQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSVQX (12 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LSVQX (0.85). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. LSVQX (25.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSVQX: SSGSX (2500) vs LSVQX (100000). LSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.13 vs. SSGSX (-8.77). LSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 104.80 vs. SSGSX (23.49).
| LSVQX | SSGSX | LSVQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.26 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.562 | -2.283 | -68% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 585M | 5.73B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 0.51 | 350% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.13 | -8.77 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.32 | -2.14 | -1,232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.80 | 23.49 | 446% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.59 | 18.39 | 389% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement