Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSVGX vs TRZRX
LSVGX vs TRZRX Comparison
Open Charts LSVGX vs TRZRX
LSV Global Value Institutional
Price$17.40
Change+$0.10 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets95.93M
T. Rowe Price Real Assets Z
Price$18.83
Change+$0.23 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.73B
LSVGX vs TRZRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSVGX vs. TRZRX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSVGX is a Hold and TRZRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZRX has more cash in the bank: 10.7B vs. LSVGX (95.9M). TRZRX pays higher dividends than LSVGX: TRZRX (3.88) vs LSVGX (2.60). LSVGX was incepted earlier than TRZRX: LSVGX (12 years) vs TRZRX (6 years). LSVGX (1.04) is less costly to investors than TRZRX (0.65). TRZRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.30 vs. LSVGX (12.00). TRZRX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSVGX: TRZRX (0) vs LSVGX (100000). TRZRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.45 vs. LSVGX (25.91). TRZRX return over 5 years is better than : 71.08 vs. LSVGX (66.20).
| LSVGX | TRZRX | LSVGX / TRZRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.65 | 160% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.448 | 7.171 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 95.9M | 10.7B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.60 | 3.88 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.91 | 37.45 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.22 | 42.40 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.20 | 71.08 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement