Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSSNX vs WCMLX
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LSSNX vs WCMLX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth N
Price$30.34
Change-$0.24 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSSNX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSSNX has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). LSSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LSSNX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LSSNX (0.83). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. LSSNX (41.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSSNX: WCMLX (100000) vs LSSNX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. LSSNX (-0.62). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. LSSNX (-20.95).
| LSSNX | WCMLX | LSSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.899 | 6.395 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 47.1M | 4,569% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.62 | 8.52 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.54 | 19.51 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.95 | -5.30 | 395% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement