Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSSNX vs WCMLX
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LSSNX vs WCMLX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth N
Price$30.45
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.19B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.09M
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSSNX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSSNX has more cash in the bank: 2.19B vs. WCMLX (43.1M). LSSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LSSNX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LSSNX (0.83). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. LSSNX (39.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSSNX: WCMLX (100000) vs LSSNX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. LSSNX (-0.88). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. LSSNX (-1.74).
| LSSNX | WCMLX | LSSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.664 | 7.232 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 43.1M | 5,079% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.88 | 1.70 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.21 | 33.88 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.74 | 12.48 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement