Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSSNX vs WCMLX
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LSSNX vs WCMLX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Growth N
Price$31.35
Change-$0.56 (-1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.91
Change-$0.24 (-1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.18M
LSSNX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSSNX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSSNX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSSNX has more cash in the bank: 2.18B vs. WCMLX (44.2M). LSSNX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSSNX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LSSNX (13 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LSSNX (0.83). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. LSSNX (41.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSSNX: WCMLX (100000) vs LSSNX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.13 vs. LSSNX (-2.24). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 2.02 vs. LSSNX (-6.94).
| LSSNX | WCMLX | LSSNX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.99 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.79 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.586 | 10.031 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 44.2M | 4,934% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.24 | 3.13 | -71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.07 | 28.99 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.94 | 2.02 | -344% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement