Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSRCX vs WCMFX
LSRCX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs WCMFX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$0.98
Change+$0.01 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets378.45M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.53B
LSRCX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. WCMFX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMFX has more cash in the bank: 22.5B vs. LSRCX (378M). LSRCX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: LSRCX (3.27) vs WCMFX (0.00). LSRCX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: LSRCX (29 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). LSRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMFX (1.45). LSRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: LSRCX (1000) vs WCMFX (100000). LSRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -46.15 vs. WCMFX (-69.00). WCMFX return over 5 years is better than : -65.91 vs. LSRCX (-82.57).
| LSRCX | WCMFX | LSRCX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.90 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.45 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.301 | 5.915 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 378M | 22.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -46.15 | -69.00 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -64.41 | -65.02 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -82.57 | -65.91 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | -92.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement