Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSRCX vs WCMFX
LSRCX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs WCMFX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$1.83
Change-$0.02 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.54M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$10.89
Change-$0.14 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4M
LSRCX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSRCX has more cash in the bank: 364M vs. WCMFX (7.41M). LSRCX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: LSRCX (0.21) vs WCMFX (0.00). LSRCX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: LSRCX (29 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). LSRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than WCMFX (1.45). LSRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: LSRCX (1000) vs WCMFX (100000). WCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -25.21 vs. LSRCX (-50.97). WCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.67 vs. LSRCX (-62.46).
| LSRCX | WCMFX | LSRCX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.90 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.45 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.684 | -9.098 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 364M | 7.41M | 4,916% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -50.97 | -25.21 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | -42.29 | 4.91 | -861% |
| Returns for 5 years | -62.46 | 13.67 | -457% |
| Returns for 10 years | -90.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers