Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSRCX vs SSGSX
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$1.91
Change+$0.03 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.05M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. LSRCX (372M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LSRCX: SSGSX (0.48) vs LSRCX (0.21). LSRCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSRCX (29 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LSRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LSRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LSRCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.24 vs. LSRCX (-49.77). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 3.18 vs. LSRCX (-64.16).
| LSRCX | SSGSX | LSRCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.526 | 1.680 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 372M | 5.18B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.48 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -49.77 | -12.24 | 407% |
| Returns for 3 years | -41.95 | -6.64 | 631% |
| Returns for 5 years | -64.16 | 3.18 | -2,016% |
| Returns for 10 years | -90.33 | 18.79 | -481% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers