Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSRCX vs SSGSX
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$1.73
Change-$0.04 (-2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets354.12M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. LSRCX (354M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LSRCX: SSGSX (0.52) vs LSRCX (0.22). LSRCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSRCX (28 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LSRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LSRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LSRCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.36 vs. LSRCX (-46.50). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.72 vs. LSRCX (-58.32).
| LSRCX | SSGSX | LSRCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.947 | -8.400 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 354M | 5.52B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.52 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | -46.50 | -8.36 | 556% |
| Returns for 3 years | -42.95 | -3.90 | 1,102% |
| Returns for 5 years | -58.32 | 21.72 | -269% |
| Returns for 10 years | -91.57 | 7.10 | -1,290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement