Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSRCX vs SSGSX
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$1.92
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets381.85M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. LSRCX (382M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LSRCX: SSGSX (0.47) vs LSRCX (0.21). LSRCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSRCX (28 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LSRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LSRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LSRCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. LSRCX (-43.42). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 22.95 vs. LSRCX (-56.55).
| LSRCX | SSGSX | LSRCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.26 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.053 | 2.046 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 382M | 5.64B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.47 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -43.42 | -1.56 | 2,784% |
| Returns for 3 years | -36.89 | 3.97 | -929% |
| Returns for 5 years | -56.55 | 22.95 | -246% |
| Returns for 10 years | -89.76 | 24.71 | -363% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement