Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSRCX vs SSGSX
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$0.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.05M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.63
Change+$0.07 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.12B
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.13B vs. LSRCX (372M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LSRCX: SSGSX (0.48) vs LSRCX (0.21). LSRCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSRCX (29 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LSRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LSRCX (42.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LSRCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. LSRCX (-50.26). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.63 vs. LSRCX (-81.94).
| LSRCX | SSGSX | LSRCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -50.000 | -1.723 | 2,902% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 372M | 5.13B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.48 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | -50.26 | -2.42 | 2,080% |
| Returns for 3 years | -63.82 | 0.45 | -14,046% |
| Returns for 5 years | -81.94 | -0.63 | 12,912% |
| Returns for 10 years | -93.24 | 18.71 | -498% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers