Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSRCX vs SSGSX
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LSRCX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value C
Price$0.99
Change-$0.88 (-47.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
LSRCX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSRCX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSRCX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. LSRCX (385M). LSRCX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: LSRCX (3.17) vs SSGSX (0.58). LSRCX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LSRCX (29 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LSRCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LSRCX (42.00). LSRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LSRCX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. LSRCX (-46.20). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.23 vs. LSRCX (-82.18).
| LSRCX | SSGSX | LSRCX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.23 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.452 | 8.123 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 385M | 5.04B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 0.58 | 550% |
| Returns for 1 year | -46.20 | 3.83 | -1,205% |
| Returns for 3 years | -65.50 | -3.10 | 2,112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -82.18 | -0.23 | 36,301% |
| Returns for 10 years | -91.86 | 53.01 | -173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers