Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXIX
LSPCX vs MBXIX Comparison
Open Charts LSPCX vs MBXIX
LoCorr Spectrum Income C
Price$5.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.12M
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy I
Price$40.44
Change-$0.11 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.45B
LSPCX vs MBXIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXIX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Hold and MBXIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXIX has more cash in the bank: 8.45B vs. LSPCX (71.1M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXIX: LSPCX (7.56) vs MBXIX (1.82). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXIX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXIX (10 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXIX (2.03). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXIX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXIX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MBXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.32 vs. LSPCX (1.39). MBXIX return over 5 years is better than : 50.54 vs. LSPCX (41.30).
| LSPCX | MBXIX | LSPCX / MBXIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 2.03 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 2.03 | 229% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.618 | 4.173 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.1M | 8.45B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.56 | 1.82 | 416% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.39 | 5.32 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.28 | 8.65 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.30 | 50.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement