Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXFX
LSPCX vs MBXFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXFX has more cash in the bank: 8.35B vs. LSPCX (71.4M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXFX: LSPCX (7.67) vs MBXFX (1.11). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXFX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXFX (5 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXFX (3.03). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXFX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.40 vs. MBXFX (0.98). MBXFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.04 vs. LSPCX (38.30).
| LSPCX | MBXFX | LSPCX / MBXFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 3.03 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 3.03 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.820 | 2.608 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.4M | 8.35B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.67 | 1.11 | 692% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.40 | 0.98 | 754% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.61 | 8.96 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.30 | 44.04 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers