Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXCX
LSPCX vs MBXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Buy and MBXCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXCX has more cash in the bank: 8.76B vs. LSPCX (72.1M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXCX: LSPCX (7.25) vs MBXCX (0.00). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXCX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXCX (10 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXCX (3.00). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXCX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.42 vs. MBXCX (6.21). MBXCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.35 vs. LSPCX (21.75).
| LSPCX | MBXCX | LSPCX / MBXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 3.00 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 3.00 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.513 | 4.153 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.1M | 8.76B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.25 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 6.21 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.15 | 18.06 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.75 | 34.35 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.75 | 89.78 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement