Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXCX
LSPCX vs MBXCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXCX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Hold and MBXCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXCX has more cash in the bank: 8.76B vs. LSPCX (71.9M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXCX: LSPCX (7.54) vs MBXCX (0.00). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXCX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXCX (10 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXCX (3.00). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXCX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXCX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. MBXCX (3.20). MBXCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. LSPCX (23.83).
| LSPCX | MBXCX | LSPCX / MBXCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 3.00 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 3.00 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.348 | 3.998 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.9M | 8.76B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.54 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.38 | 3.20 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.52 | 18.33 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.83 | 37.59 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.72 | 89.19 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement