Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSPCX vs MBXAX
LSPCX vs MBXAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSPCX vs. MBXAX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSPCX is a Buy and MBXAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBXAX has more cash in the bank: 8.33B vs. LSPCX (71.2M). LSPCX pays higher dividends than MBXAX: LSPCX (7.46) vs MBXAX (1.60). LSPCX was incepted earlier than MBXAX: LSPCX (12 years) vs MBXAX (10 years). LSPCX (4.64) is less costly to investors than MBXAX (2.28). LSPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. MBXAX (19.00). LSPCX (2500) and MBXAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LSPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.14 vs. MBXAX (0.46). MBXAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.94 vs. LSPCX (28.92).
| LSPCX | MBXAX | LSPCX / MBXAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 4.61 | 2.28 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.64 | 2.28 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.403 | 3.244 | 259% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 71.2M | 8.33B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.46 | 1.60 | 467% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.14 | 0.46 | 892% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.63 | 13.01 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.92 | 42.94 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement