Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSOFX vs NLSCX
LSOFX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts LSOFX vs NLSCX
LS Opportunity Fund Institutional Class
Price$18.19
Change-$0.50 (-2.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets101.42M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
LSOFX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSOFX vs. NLSCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSOFX is a StrongBuy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. LSOFX (101M). LSOFX pays higher dividends than NLSCX: LSOFX (0.45) vs NLSCX (0.00). LSOFX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: LSOFX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). LSOFX (2.72) is less costly to investors than NLSCX (2.43). LSOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.66 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSOFX: NLSCX (1000) vs LSOFX (5000). NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. LSOFX (-0.59). LSOFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.02 vs. NLSCX (14.66).
| LSOFX | NLSCX | LSOFX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.69 | 2.43 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.72 | 2.43 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.943 | -0.693 | -136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 8.16B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.59 | 2.65 | -22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.38 | 22.54 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.02 | 14.66 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.36 | 52.68 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement