Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSNGX vs RPEBX
LSNGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSNGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth N
Price$24.45
Change+$0.15 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.73M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$69.46
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.96B
LSNGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSNGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSNGX is a Buy and RPEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSNGX (136M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSNGX: RPEBX (0.12) vs LSNGX (0.00). LSNGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSNGX (8 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than LSNGX (1.06). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSNGX (6.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSNGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSNGX (1000000). LSNGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.48 vs. RPEBX (13.00). LSNGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.59 vs. RPEBX (35.37).
| LSNGX | RPEBX | LSNGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.21 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.21 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.484 | 15.057 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.48 | 13.00 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.97 | 32.98 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.59 | 35.37 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers