LSMNF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
198.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TNLIY
Price
$6.30
Change
-$0.02 (-0.32%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSMNF vs TNLIY

Header iconLSMNF vs TNLIY Comparison
Open Charts LSMNF vs TNLIYBanner chart's image
Lastminute.com
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization198.94M
Trainline
Price$6.30
Change-$0.02 (-0.32%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.12B
LSMNF vs TNLIY Comparison Chart in %
TNLIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSMNF vs. TNLIY commentary
Jan 16, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSMNF is a Hold and TNLIY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 16, 2026
Stock price -- (LSMNF: $19.92 vs. TNLIY: $6.30)
Brand notoriety: LSMNF and TNLIY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSMNF: 100% vs. TNLIY: 73%
Market capitalization -- LSMNF: $198.94M vs. TNLIY: $1.12B
LSMNF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $198.94M. TNLIY’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $167.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $17.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSMNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNLIY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LSMNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TNLIY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSMNF is a better buy in the long-term than TNLIY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TNLIY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TNLIY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

LSMNF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TNLIY (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -4.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-4.05% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNLIY($1.12B) has a higher market cap than LSMNF($199M). TNLIY (14.01) and LSMNF (13.56) have similar P/E ratio . LSMNF (0.000) and TNLIY (0.000) have similar YTD gains . TNLIY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 126M vs. LSMNF (52.6M). TNLIY has more cash in the bank: 121M vs. LSMNF (104M). LSMNF has less debt than TNLIY: LSMNF (15.6M) vs TNLIY (151M). TNLIY has higher revenues than LSMNF: TNLIY (429M) vs LSMNF (345M).
LSMNFTNLIYLSMNF / TNLIY
Capitalization199M1.12B18%
EBITDA52.6M126M42%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio13.5614.0197%
Revenue345M429M80%
Total Cash104M121M86%
Total Debt15.6M151M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSMNF: Fundamental Ratings
LSMNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
40
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
49
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSMNFTNLIY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TNLIY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBGEX57.490.84
+1.48%
Neuberger Genesis Tr
TEGCX16.870.19
+1.14%
Touchstone Sands Cptl Emerg Mkts Gr C
BWLIX25.920.14
+0.54%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value Inv
MSGQX11.840.05
+0.42%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars C
TEMUX18.450.04
+0.22%
Morgan Stanley Pathway Em Mkts Eq

LSMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSMNF and ABNB have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSMNF and ABNB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSMNF
1D Price
Change %
LSMNF100%
N/A
ABNB - LSMNF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
ONVC - LSMNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUIFF - LSMNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - LSMNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDDF - LSMNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TNLIY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TNLIY and ONVC have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNLIY and ONVC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNLIY
1D Price
Change %
TNLIY100%
N/A
ONVC - TNLIY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TUIFF - TNLIY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WEBJF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - TNLIY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More