LSMNF
Price
$19.92
Change
-$3.93 (-16.48%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
215.88M
OOBHF
Price
$4.10
Change
+$1.35 (+49.09%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
584.04M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSMNF vs OOBHF

Header iconLSMNF vs OOBHF Comparison
Open Charts LSMNF vs OOBHFBanner chart's image
Lastminute.com
Price$19.92
Change-$3.93 (-16.48%)
Volume$100
Capitalization215.88M
On the Beach Group
Price$4.10
Change+$1.35 (+49.09%)
Volume$15K
Capitalization584.04M
LSMNF vs OOBHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LSMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OOBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSMNF vs. OOBHF commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSMNF is a Hold and OOBHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (LSMNF: $19.92 vs. OOBHF: $4.10)
Brand notoriety: LSMNF and OOBHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSMNF: 21% vs. OOBHF: 165%
Market capitalization -- LSMNF: $215.88M vs. OOBHF: $584.04M
LSMNF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $215.88M. OOBHF’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $584.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $175.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $16.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSMNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOOBHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSMNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OOBHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LSMNF and OOBHF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSMNF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OOBHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSMNF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • OOBHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OOBHF is a better buy in the short-term than LSMNF.

Price Growth

LSMNF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OOBHF (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +1.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.13%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+1.18% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OOBHF($584M) has a higher market cap than LSMNF($216M). OOBHF has higher P/E ratio than LSMNF: OOBHF (25.79) vs LSMNF (11.62). OOBHF YTD gains are higher at: 70.822 vs. LSMNF (-16.478). OOBHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 45.7M vs. LSMNF (43.2M). LSMNF has more cash in the bank: 43.2M vs. OOBHF (10.5M). LSMNF has less debt than OOBHF: LSMNF (5.5M) vs OOBHF (42M). LSMNF has higher revenues than OOBHF: LSMNF (314M) vs OOBHF (132M).
LSMNFOOBHFLSMNF / OOBHF
Capitalization216M584M37%
EBITDA43.2M45.7M95%
Gain YTD-16.47870.822-23%
P/E Ratio11.6225.7945%
Revenue314M132M238%
Total Cash43.2M10.5M411%
Total Debt5.5M42M13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSMNF vs OOBHF: Fundamental Ratings
LSMNF
OOBHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1872
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8437
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSMNF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as OOBHF (54). This means that LSMNF’s stock grew similarly to OOBHF’s over the last 12 months.

LSMNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OOBHF (100). This means that LSMNF’s stock grew similarly to OOBHF’s over the last 12 months.

LSMNF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OOBHF (72). This means that LSMNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OOBHF’s over the last 12 months.

OOBHF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSMNF (84). This means that OOBHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSMNF’s over the last 12 months.

OOBHF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSMNF (51). This means that OOBHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSMNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSMNFOOBHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
7%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSMNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OOBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TWVLX8.220.05
+0.61%
American Century Value Inv
GQESX34.060.19
+0.56%
GMO Quality R6
IPMIX19.680.04
+0.20%
Voya Index Plus MidCap Port I
MEGMX15.12-0.08
-0.53%
Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Inv
WCMNX12.65-0.09
-0.71%
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor

LSMNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSMNF and ABNB have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSMNF and ABNB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSMNF
1D Price
Change %
LSMNF100%
N/A
ABNB - LSMNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
TUIFF - LSMNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TNLIY - LSMNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ONVC - LSMNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGDDF - LSMNF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

OOBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OOBHF and TUIFF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OOBHF and TUIFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OOBHF
1D Price
Change %
OOBHF100%
N/A
TUIFF - OOBHF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABNB - OOBHF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
WEBJF - OOBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSMNF - OOBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WOSSF - OOBHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More