Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSHCX vs PEMGX
LSHCX vs PEMGX Comparison
Open Charts LSHCX vs PEMGX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corp Rest Adv C
Price$24.04
Change+$0.63 (+2.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.19M
LSHCX vs PEMGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSHCX vs. PEMGX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSHCX is a Buy and PEMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PEMGX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. LSHCX (29.2M). LSHCX pays higher dividends than PEMGX: LSHCX (0.16) vs PEMGX (0.00). LSHCX was incepted earlier than PEMGX: LSHCX (19 years) vs PEMGX (21 years). LSHCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than PEMGX (0.91). PEMGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.70 vs. LSHCX (6.00). PEMGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSHCX: PEMGX (1000) vs LSHCX (2500). PEMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.15 vs. LSHCX (-28.37). LSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 67.69 vs. PEMGX (12.32).
| LSHCX | PEMGX | LSHCX / PEMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.29 | 0.91 | 252% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.91 | 281% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.728 | -1.964 | -903% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.2M | 29.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.37 | -10.15 | 280% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.59 | 21.59 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.69 | 12.32 | 549% |
| Returns for 10 years | 231.79 | 117.81 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement