Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGRX vs RGEBX
LSGRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSGRX vs RGEBX
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$32.61
Change+$0.16 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.57B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.73
Change+$0.27 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
LSGRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGRX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. LSGRX (17.6B). LSGRX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSGRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LSGRX (34 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than LSGRX (0.67). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. LSGRX (10.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: RGEBX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.28 vs. RGEBX (16.90). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 56.85 vs. RGEBX (45.14).
| LSGRX | RGEBX | LSGRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.09 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.318 | 13.004 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 17.6B | 328B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.28 | 16.90 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.46 | 55.95 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.85 | 45.14 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 190.58 | 78.81 | 242% |