Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGRX vs RGEBX
LSGRX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSGRX vs RGEBX
Loomis Sayles Growth Y
Price$33.14
Change-$0.45 (-1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.13B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.85
Change-$0.83 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
LSGRX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGRX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGRX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LSGRX (18.1B). LSGRX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . LSGRX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: LSGRX (35 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than LSGRX (0.67). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. LSGRX (7.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGRX: RGEBX (250) vs LSGRX (100000). LSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.43 vs. RGEBX (8.68). LSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 45.35 vs. RGEBX (16.94).
| LSGRX | RGEBX | LSGRX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.08 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.08 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.241 | 1.552 | -16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1B | 336B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.43 | 8.68 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 89.26 | 53.46 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.35 | 16.94 | 268% |
| Returns for 10 years | 219.54 | 111.87 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers