LSGOF
Price
$8.70
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
6.17B
UNBLF
Price
$95.46
Change
+$1.15 (+1.22%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
7.9B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSGOF vs UNBLF

Header iconLSGOF vs UNBLF Comparison
Open Charts LSGOF vs UNBLFBanner chart's image
Land Securities Group
Price$8.70
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$592
Capitalization6.17B
Unibail-Rodamco SE
Price$95.46
Change+$1.15 (+1.22%)
Volume$105
Capitalization7.9B
LSGOF vs UNBLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LSGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSGOF vs. UNBLF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGOF is a Hold and UNBLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (LSGOF: $8.70 vs. UNBLF: $95.46)
Brand notoriety: LSGOF and UNBLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSGOF: 17% vs. UNBLF: 20%
Market capitalization -- LSGOF: $6.17B vs. UNBLF: $7.9B
LSGOF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $6.17B. UNBLF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $7.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSGOF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUNBLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LSGOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UNBLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNBLF is a better buy in the long-term than LSGOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSGOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNBLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSGOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UNBLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UNBLF is a better buy in the short-term than LSGOF.

Price Growth

LSGOF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а +0.06% price change this week, while UNBLF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.40% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNBLF($7.9B) has a higher market cap than LSGOF($6.17B). UNBLF has higher P/E ratio than LSGOF: UNBLF (42.74) vs LSGOF (11.61). UNBLF YTD gains are higher at: 28.972 vs. LSGOF (23.616). UNBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -76.2M vs. LSGOF (-527M). UNBLF has more cash in the bank: 3.83B vs. LSGOF (42M). LSGOF has less debt than UNBLF: LSGOF (3.54B) vs UNBLF (26.6B). UNBLF has higher revenues than LSGOF: UNBLF (3.11B) vs LSGOF (791M).
LSGOFUNBLFLSGOF / UNBLF
Capitalization6.17B7.9B78%
EBITDA-527M-76.2M692%
Gain YTD23.61628.97282%
P/E Ratio11.6142.7427%
Revenue791M3.11B25%
Total Cash42M3.83B1%
Total Debt3.54B26.6B13%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSGOF vs UNBLF: Fundamental Ratings
LSGOF
UNBLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7253
SMR RATING
1..100
9398
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9861
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
28n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSGOF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (71). This means that LSGOF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LSGOF (72). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to LSGOF’s over the last 12 months.

LSGOF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBLF (98). This means that LSGOF’s stock grew similarly to UNBLF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as LSGOF (47). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew similarly to LSGOF’s over the last 12 months.

UNBLF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSGOF (98). This means that UNBLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSGOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSGOFUNBLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTEC200.502.73
+1.38%
Fidelity MSCI Information Tech ETF
CLSE23.570.27
+1.16%
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
BUFF47.240.22
+0.47%
Innovator Laddered Allc Pwr Bfr ETF™
AAA25.090.11
+0.46%
Alternative AccessFirstPriorityCLO BdETF
DXYZ36.38-0.79
-2.13%
Destiny Tech100

LSGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSGOF has been loosely correlated with UTGPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSGOF jumps, then UTGPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSGOF
1D Price
Change %
LSGOF100%
N/A
UTGPF - LSGOF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
APYRF - LSGOF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNBLF - LSGOF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - LSGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
MRPRF - LSGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UNBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNBLF and LSGOF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNBLF and LSGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNBLF
1D Price
Change %
UNBLF100%
N/A
LSGOF - UNBLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTLCY - UNBLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
CHTH - UNBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATRRF - UNBLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WDPSF - UNBLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More