Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSGGX vs RPEBX
LSGGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSGGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Y
Price$25.34
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.66M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$70.73
Change+$0.36 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets160.61B
LSGGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSGGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSGGX is a Hold and RPEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. LSGGX (141M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSGGX: RPEBX (0.12) vs LSGGX (0.00). LSGGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSGGX (9 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than LSGGX (1.13). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSGGX (6.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSGGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSGGX (100000). LSGGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.40 vs. RPEBX (10.20). LSGGX return over 5 years is better than : 48.36 vs. RPEBX (37.72).
| LSGGX | RPEBX | LSGGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 1.21 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.21 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.070 | 17.161 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 161B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.40 | 10.20 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.21 | 59.79 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.36 | 37.72 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 103.91 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement