Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RWMHX
LSFLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RWMHX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.04
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.14M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.64
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
LSFLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. LSFLX (74.1M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RWMHX (1.33) vs LSFLX (0.58). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: LSFLX (0) vs RWMHX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. RWMHX (3.99). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 49.64 vs. LSFLX (11.44).
| LSFLX | RWMHX | LSFLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.41 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.41 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.634 | 9.663 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.1M | 207B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.33 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 3.99 | 289% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.42 | 41.40 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.44 | 49.64 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement