Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RWMHX
LSFLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RWMHX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.97
Change+$0.87 (+5.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.61M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LSFLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LSFLX (111M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RWMHX (1.36) vs LSFLX (0.22). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LSFLX (7 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: LSFLX (0) vs RWMHX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.06 vs. RWMHX (5.40). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. LSFLX (0.63).
| LSFLX | RWMHX | LSFLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.41 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.41 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.032 | 1.523 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.36 | 16% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.06 | 5.40 | 298% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.28 | 30.10 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.63 | 37.20 | 2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.94 | - |