Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RWEBX
LSFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.04
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.14M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
LSFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. LSFLX (74.1M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LSFLX (0.58). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: LSFLX (0) vs RWEBX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.53 vs. RWEBX (3.29). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. LSFLX (11.44).
| LSFLX | RWEBX | LSFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.06 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.06 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.634 | 9.079 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.1M | 206B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.76 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.53 | 3.29 | 351% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.42 | 38.78 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.44 | 45.88 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.45 | - |