Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMFEX
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.68
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.42M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.74
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LSFLX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LSFLX (83.4M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFEX (1.43) vs LSFLX (0.00). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.81 vs. RMFEX (8.21). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. LSFLX (5.01).
| LSFLX | RMFEX | LSFLX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.62 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.62 | 265% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.512 | 9.983 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.81 | 8.21 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.18 | 29.84 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.01 | 48.39 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.98 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement