Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMFCX
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.97
Change+$0.87 (+5.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.61M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.14
Change-$1.74 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LSFLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LSFLX (111M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LSFLX (0.22). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LSFLX (7 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LSFLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.06 vs. RMFCX (7.45). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.16 vs. LSFLX (0.63).
| LSFLX | RMFCX | LSFLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.91 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.032 | 2.244 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.24 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.06 | 7.45 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.28 | 28.73 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.63 | 44.16 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 105.79 | - |