Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.03
Change-$0.02 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.62M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LSFLX (58.6M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMEBX (1.09) vs LSFLX (0.59). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LSFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. RMEBX (7.57). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. LSFLX (11.38).
| LSFLX | RMEBX | LSFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.07 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.329 | 11.308 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.6M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.09 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.74 | 7.57 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.92 | 31.59 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.38 | 55.29 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.40 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement