Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.52
Change+$0.18 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets89.74M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.83
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LSFLX (89.7M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMEBX (1.03) vs LSFLX (0.00). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LSFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. RMEBX (5.38). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.74 vs. LSFLX (5.13).
| LSFLX | RMEBX | LSFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.07 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.378 | 14.812 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 89.7M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | 5.38 | 214% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.08 | 26.56 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.13 | 51.74 | 10% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement