Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSFLX vs RMEBX
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSFLX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value R4
Price$15.68
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.42M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LSFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSFLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSFLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LSFLX (83.4M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LSFLX: RMEBX (1.03) vs LSFLX (0.00). LSFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LSFLX (6 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LSFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LSFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LSFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LSFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LSFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.81 vs. RMEBX (7.85). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.24 vs. LSFLX (5.01).
| LSFLX | RMEBX | LSFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.07 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.512 | 9.617 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 83.4M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.03 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.81 | 7.85 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.18 | 28.25 | 224% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.01 | 45.24 | 11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.81 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement