LSF
Price
$2.68
Change
-$0.03 (-1.11%)
Updated
Jan 15, 11:20 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
28.96M
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WHGLY
Price
$21.87
Change
-$0.19 (-0.86%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
14.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSF vs WHGLY

Header iconLSF vs WHGLY Comparison
Open Charts LSF vs WHGLYBanner chart's image
Laird Superfood
Price$2.68
Change-$0.03 (-1.11%)
Volume$250
Capitalization28.96M
WH Group
Price$21.87
Change-$0.19 (-0.86%)
Volume$15.18K
Capitalization14.06B
LSF vs WHGLY Comparison Chart in %
LSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSF vs. WHGLY commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSF is a Hold and WHGLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (LSF: $2.71 vs. WHGLY: $21.87)
Brand notoriety: LSF and WHGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSF: 46% vs. WHGLY: 48%
Market capitalization -- LSF: $28.96M vs. WHGLY: $14.06B
LSF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $28.96M. WHGLY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $14.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $245.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • LSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WHGLY is a better buy in the long-term than LSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHGLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WHGLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LSF is a better buy in the short-term than WHGLY.

Price Growth

LSF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +13.87% price change this week, while WHGLY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.79% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGLY($14.1B) has a higher market cap than LSF($29M). LSF YTD gains are higher at: 22.072 vs. WHGLY (-1.491). WHGLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.61B vs. LSF (-1.84M). WHGLY has more cash in the bank: 1.83B vs. LSF (5.08M). LSF has less debt than WHGLY: LSF (179K) vs WHGLY (4.35B). WHGLY has higher revenues than LSF: WHGLY (27B) vs LSF (48.1M).
LSFWHGLYLSF / WHGLY
Capitalization29M14.1B0%
EBITDA-1.84M2.61B-0%
Gain YTD22.072-1.491-1,480%
P/E RatioN/A8.69-
Revenue48.1M27B0%
Total Cash5.08M1.83B0%
Total Debt179K4.35B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGLY: Fundamental Ratings
WHGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
61
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSFWHGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WHGLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVA35.520.23
+0.65%
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
CPNM26.08N/A
N/A
Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Mar
NAD12.16-0.01
-0.08%
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income Fund
NVBW34.01-0.11
-0.31%
AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF
FLAO28.60-0.10
-0.33%
AllianzIM US Equity 6M Flr5 Apr/Oct ETF

LSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and STKL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and STKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSF
1D Price
Change %
LSF100%
-1.81%
STKL - LSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
NATR - LSF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
OTLY - LSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FAMI - LSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.79%
BHST - LSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
More

WHGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WHGLY has been loosely correlated with CIADY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WHGLY jumps, then CIADY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGLY
1D Price
Change %
WHGLY100%
-0.86%
CIADY - WHGLY
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
TYCMY - WHGLY
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
ASBFY - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
USNA - WHGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
LSF - WHGLY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
More