LSF
Price
$5.81
Change
-$0.43 (-6.89%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
61.96M
40 days until earnings call
PFODF
Price
$2.75
Change
+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSF vs PFODF

Header iconLSF vs PFODF Comparison
Open Charts LSF vs PFODFBanner chart's image
Laird Superfood
Price$5.81
Change-$0.43 (-6.89%)
Volume$13.19K
Capitalization61.96M
Premier Foods
Price$2.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.73%)
Volume$3.7K
Capitalization2.23B
LSF vs PFODF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSF vs. PFODF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSF is a StrongBuy and PFODF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (LSF: $5.81 vs. PFODF: $2.75)
Brand notoriety: LSF and PFODF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSF: 32% vs. PFODF: 100%
Market capitalization -- LSF: $61.96M vs. PFODF: $2.23B
LSF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $61.96M. PFODF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $2.23B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $229.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePFODF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PFODF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PFODF is a better buy in the long-term than LSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

LSF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -2.52% price change this week, while PFODF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +183.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSF is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.99% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFODF($2.23B) has a higher market cap than LSF($62M). PFODF YTD gains are higher at: 10.000 vs. LSF (-26.396). PFODF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 232M vs. LSF (-1.11M). PFODF has more cash in the bank: 192M vs. LSF (3.93M). LSF has less debt than PFODF: LSF (202K) vs PFODF (335M). PFODF has higher revenues than LSF: PFODF (1.15B) vs LSF (47M).
LSFPFODFLSF / PFODF
Capitalization62M2.23B3%
EBITDA-1.11M232M-0%
Gain YTD-26.39610.000-264%
P/E RatioN/A14.44-
Revenue47M1.15B4%
Total Cash3.93M192M2%
Total Debt202K335M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PFODF: Fundamental Ratings
PFODF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
47
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSFPFODF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAWEM21.00N/A
N/A
Hawaiian Electric Co., Inc.
MSLOY15.68N/A
N/A
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd.
ANZLY1.70N/A
N/A
Air New Zealand Ltd.
CMRZF0.10N/A
N/A
Commerce Resources Corp.
TUWLF0.15N/A
N/A
Tullow Oil Plc.

LSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and STKL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and STKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSF
1D Price
Change %
LSF100%
-7.05%
STKL - LSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
NATR - LSF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
PFODF - LSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THS - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.19%
USNA - LSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
More

PFODF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFODF has been loosely correlated with SHGXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFODF jumps, then SHGXY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PFODF
1D Price
Change %
PFODF100%
N/A
SHGXY - PFODF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LSF - PFODF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.05%
STKL - PFODF
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
ORKLY - PFODF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIFMY - PFODF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More