LSF
Price
$2.76
Change
-$0.02 (-0.72%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.39M
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NATR
Price
$25.90
Change
+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
453.14M
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSF vs NATR

Header iconLSF vs NATR Comparison
Open Charts LSF vs NATRBanner chart's image
Laird Superfood
Price$2.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.72%)
Volume$100
Capitalization29.39M
Nature's Sunshine Products
Price$25.90
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Volume$258.57K
Capitalization453.14M
LSF vs NATR Comparison Chart in %
LSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NATR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSF vs. NATR commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSF is a Buy and NATR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (LSF: $2.78 vs. NATR: $25.85)
Brand notoriety: LSF and NATR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSF: 81% vs. NATR: 210%
Market capitalization -- LSF: $29.39M vs. NATR: $453.14M
LSF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $29.39M. NATR’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $453.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $258.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNATR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NATR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NATR is a better buy in the long-term than LSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NATR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both LSF and NATR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

LSF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -14.72% price change this week, while NATR (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +7.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +238.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 11, 2026.

NATR is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (+1.23% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NATR($453M) has a higher market cap than LSF($29.4M). LSF YTD gains are higher at: 25.225 vs. NATR (19.787). NATR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 40.4M vs. LSF (-1.84M). NATR has more cash in the bank: 95.6M vs. LSF (5.08M). LSF has less debt than NATR: LSF (179K) vs NATR (14.3M). NATR has higher revenues than LSF: NATR (475M) vs LSF (48.1M).
LSFNATRLSF / NATR
Capitalization29.4M453M6%
EBITDA-1.84M40.4M-5%
Gain YTD25.22519.787127%
P/E RatioN/A31.98-
Revenue48.1M475M10%
Total Cash5.08M95.6M5%
Total Debt179K14.3M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NATR: Fundamental Ratings
NATR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
20
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
55
SMR RATING
1..100
72
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSFNATR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NATR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYPMX316.9314.59
+4.83%
Rydex Precious Metals Inv
VCSOX31.510.02
+0.06%
VALIC Company I Intl Sclly Rspnb
FOPTX21.63N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps M
TSWMX12.45N/A
N/A
TSW Emerging Markets Institutional
FGSAX59.04-1.07
-1.78%
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A

LSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and STKL have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and STKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSF
1D Price
Change %
LSF100%
-8.55%
STKL - LSF
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
NATR - LSF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
USNA - LSF
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.63%
OTLY - LSF
24%
Poorly correlated
-4.66%
FAMI - LSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.51%
More

NATR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NATR and USNA have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NATR and USNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NATR
1D Price
Change %
NATR100%
-2.23%
USNA - NATR
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.63%
BGS - NATR
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
SENEA - NATR
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
LSF - NATR
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.55%
THS - NATR
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More