LSF vs NATR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSF is a Hold and NATR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNATR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NATR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NATR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LSF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.37% price change this week, while NATR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
LSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
NATR is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.58% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| LSF | NATR | LSF / NATR | |
| Capitalization | 24.9M | 392M | 6% |
| EBITDA | -10.39M | 32.1M | -32% |
| Gain YTD | 792.308 | -9.485 | -8,353% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 27.06 | - |
| Revenue | 34.2M | 445M | 8% |
| Total Cash | 7.57M | 82.4M | 9% |
| Total Debt | 383K | 14.9M | 3% |
NATR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LSF | NATR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
LSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and PFODF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and PFODF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSF | 100% | -2.29% | ||
| PFODF - LSF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WEST - LSF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
| NATR - LSF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| BYND - LSF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.43% | ||
| BHST - LSF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||
NATR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATR has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATR jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NATR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATR | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| USNA - NATR | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| DAR - NATR | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.19% | ||
| CENTA - NATR | 35% Loosely correlated | +6.03% | ||
| CENT - NATR | 33% Loosely correlated | +6.01% | ||
| WEST - NATR | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||