It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMGAAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
LSF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.23% price change this week, while MGAAF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.71%.
LSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
LSF | MGAAF | LSF / MGAAF | |
Capitalization | 24.9M | 1.5B | 2% |
EBITDA | -10.39M | 34.4B | -0% |
Gain YTD | 863.736 | -50.000 | -1,727% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 20.92 | - |
Revenue | 34.2M | 190B | 0% |
Total Cash | 7.57M | 46.7B | 0% |
Total Debt | 383K | 19B | 0% |
LSF | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and PFODF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and PFODF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LSF | 100% | +4.40% | ||
PFODF - LSF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WEST - LSF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
NATR - LSF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.25% | ||
BYND - LSF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
BRCC - LSF | 9% Poorly correlated | +6.03% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that MGAAF and LSF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGAAF and LSF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGAAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MGAAF | 100% | N/A | ||
LSF - MGAAF | 7% Poorly correlated | +4.40% | ||
BTSDF - MGAAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WLMIF - MGAAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WWNTF - MGAAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WWNTY - MGAAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |