Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs RPEBX
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs RPEBX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.58
Change+$0.16 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.04M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$69.98
Change+$0.65 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
LSCGX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. RPEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSCGX (138M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: RPEBX (0.12) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: LSCGX (9 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.21). RPEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: RPEBX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.65 vs. RPEBX (14.50). LSCGX return over 5 years is better than : 34.17 vs. RPEBX (32.38).
| LSCGX | RPEBX | LSCGX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.21 | 161% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 1.21 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.396 | 15.388 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.65 | 14.50 | 198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.00 | 47.01 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.17 | 32.38 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers