Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs RNPHX
LSCGX vs RNPHX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs RNPHX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.59
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.63M
American Funds New Perspective R5E
Price$70.31
Change+$0.09 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
LSCGX vs RNPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. RNPHX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Hold and RNPHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPHX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. LSCGX (134M). RNPHX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: RNPHX (0.62) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than RNPHX: LSCGX (10 years) vs RNPHX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RNPHX (0.56). RNPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). RNPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: RNPHX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.35 vs. RNPHX (11.78). LSCGX return over 5 years is better than : 28.64 vs. RNPHX (21.82).
| LSCGX | RNPHX | LSCGX / RNPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.56 | 348% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.56 | 380% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.656 | 14.437 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.35 | 11.78 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 92.26 | 52.72 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.64 | 21.82 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers