Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LSCGX vs RNPHX
LSCGX vs RNPHX Comparison
Open Charts LSCGX vs RNPHX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth C
Price$22.58
Change+$0.16 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.04M
American Funds New Perspective R5E
Price$71.55
Change+$0.67 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
LSCGX vs RNPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LSCGX vs. RNPHX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCGX is a Buy and RNPHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPHX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. LSCGX (138M). RNPHX pays higher dividends than LSCGX: RNPHX (0.65) vs LSCGX (0.00). LSCGX was incepted earlier than RNPHX: LSCGX (9 years) vs RNPHX (10 years). LSCGX (2.13) is less costly to investors than RNPHX (0.56). RNPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. LSCGX (6.00). RNPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LSCGX: RNPHX (250) vs LSCGX (2500). LSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.65 vs. RNPHX (15.33). RNPHX (35.89) and LSCGX (34.17) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LSCGX | RNPHX | LSCGX / RNPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.56 | 348% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.13 | 0.56 | 380% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.396 | 15.902 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.65 | 15.33 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.00 | 49.20 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.17 | 35.89 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers