LSCC
Price
$66.11
Change
+$0.14 (+0.21%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.05B
58 days until earnings call
RNWEF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.02 (-9.52%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
56.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

LSCC vs RNWEF

Header iconLSCC vs RNWEF Comparison
Open Charts LSCC vs RNWEFBanner chart's image
Lattice Semiconductor
Price$66.11
Change+$0.14 (+0.21%)
Volume$2.23M
Capitalization9.05B
REC SILICON ASA
Price$0.19
Change-$0.02 (-9.52%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization56.2M
LSCC vs RNWEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LSCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RNWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LSCC vs. RNWEF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LSCC is a Buy and RNWEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (LSCC: $66.11 vs. RNWEF: $0.19)
Brand notoriety: LSCC: Notable vs. RNWEF: Not notable
LSCC represents the Semiconductors, while RNWEF is part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LSCC: 90% vs. RNWEF: 6%
Market capitalization -- LSCC: $9.05B vs. RNWEF: $56.2M
LSCC [@Semiconductors] is valued at $9.05B. RNWEF’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $56.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $4.07T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $302.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $89.41B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LSCC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRNWEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LSCC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RNWEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSCC is a better buy in the long-term than RNWEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSCC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNWEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LSCC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RNWEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RNWEF is a better buy in the short-term than LSCC.

Price Growth

LSCC (@Semiconductors) experienced а -0.41% price change this week, while RNWEF (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.28%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSCC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Semiconductors (-0.42% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

@Electronic Production Equipment (+0.31% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LSCC($9.05B) has a higher market cap than RNWEF($56.2M). LSCC has higher P/E ratio than RNWEF: LSCC (287.43) vs RNWEF (15.40). LSCC YTD gains are higher at: 16.699 vs. RNWEF (-35.330). RNWEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 188M vs. LSCC (76.3M). LSCC has more cash in the bank: 107M vs. RNWEF (16.8M). LSCC has less debt than RNWEF: LSCC (21.9M) vs RNWEF (64M). LSCC has higher revenues than RNWEF: LSCC (489M) vs RNWEF (120M).
LSCCRNWEFLSCC / RNWEF
Capitalization9.05B56.2M16,103%
EBITDA76.3M188M41%
Gain YTD16.699-35.330-47%
P/E Ratio287.4315.401,866%
Revenue489M120M408%
Total Cash107M16.8M637%
Total Debt21.9M64M34%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LSCC vs RNWEF: Fundamental Ratings
LSCC
RNWEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
8699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
250
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RNWEF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LSCC (93) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that RNWEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LSCC’s over the last 12 months.

LSCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNWEF (100) in the null industry. This means that LSCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

LSCC's SMR Rating (86) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RNWEF (99) in the null industry. This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

LSCC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as RNWEF (62) in the null industry. This means that LSCC’s stock grew similarly to RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

LSCC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RNWEF (50) in the null industry. This means that LSCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RNWEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSCCRNWEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LSCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RNWEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBGZF0.300.01
+2.28%
Cabral Gold Inc.
FSUGY24.700.04
+0.15%
FORTESCUE LTD.
SZHFF21.50N/A
N/A
Sojitz Corp.
BRIOF0.08N/A
N/A
Magna Terra Minerals Inc.
STMRF1.20N/A
N/A
Stanmore Res Ltd

LSCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSCC has been closely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LSCC jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSCC
1D Price
Change %
LSCC100%
+0.21%
MCHP - LSCC
76%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
KLIC - LSCC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
ENTG - LSCC
75%
Closely correlated
+2.93%
LRCX - LSCC
74%
Closely correlated
+2.52%
NXPI - LSCC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
More

RNWEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNWEF has been loosely correlated with RNWEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RNWEF jumps, then RNWEY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RNWEF
1D Price
Change %
RNWEF100%
N/A
RNWEY - RNWEF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IFNNY - RNWEF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.83%
IFNNF - RNWEF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.89%
LSCC - RNWEF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
RNECY - RNWEF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
More