Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSVX vs WCMFX
LRSVX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts LRSVX vs WCMFX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R6
Price$20.83
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets371.88M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.62
Change+$0.01 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62M
LRSVX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSVX vs. WCMFX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSVX is a Buy and WCMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRSVX has more cash in the bank: 372M vs. WCMFX (1.62M). LRSVX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: LRSVX (0.20) vs WCMFX (0.00). LRSVX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: LRSVX (11 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than LRSVX (0.88). LRSVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). LRSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: LRSVX (0) vs WCMFX (100000). LRSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.03 vs. WCMFX (-70.35). LRSVX return over 5 years is better than : 11.79 vs. WCMFX (-65.36).
| LRSVX | WCMFX | LRSVX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.90 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.45 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.884 | -69.783 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 372M | 1.62M | 23,020% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.03 | -70.35 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.05 | -63.51 | -38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.79 | -65.36 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -12.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement