Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSVX vs SSGSX
LRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSVX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R6
Price$21.80
Change+$0.77 (+3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
LRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. LRSVX (385M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSVX: SSGSX (0.58) vs LRSVX (0.37). LRSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSVX (11 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) is less costly to investors than LRSVX (0.88). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LRSVX (42.00). LRSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSVX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. LRSVX (2.94). LRSVX return over 5 years is better than : 7.57 vs. SSGSX (-0.23).
| LRSVX | SSGSX | LRSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.23 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.23 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.654 | 8.123 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 385M | 5.04B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.37 | 0.58 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.94 | 3.83 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.21 | -3.10 | -523% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.57 | -0.23 | -3,345% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.13 | 53.01 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement