Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSTX vs SSGSX
LRSTX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSTX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R5
Price$21.33
Change+$0.37 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets381.85M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
LRSTX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSTX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSTX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. LRSTX (382M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSTX: SSGSX (0.47) vs LRSTX (0.20). LRSTX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSTX (10 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSTX (0.96). LRSTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSTX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. LRSTX (-1.93). LRSTX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| LRSTX | SSGSX | LRSTX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.26 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.619 | 2.046 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 382M | 5.64B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.47 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.93 | -1.56 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.33 | 3.97 | 713% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 22.95 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.44 | 24.71 | -95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement