Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSSX vs SSGSX
LRSSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSSX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R4
Price$15.43
Change+$0.30 (+1.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.78M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$48.32
Change+$1.94 (+4.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
LRSSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSSX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. LRSSX (385M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSSX: SSGSX (0.58) vs LRSSX (0.22). LRSSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSSX (11 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.23) and LRSSX (1.21) have similar cost to investors . SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LRSSX (42.00). LRSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSSX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. LRSSX (0.89). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.23 vs. LRSSX (-3.56).
| LRSSX | SSGSX | LRSSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.23 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.634 | 8.123 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 385M | 5.04B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.58 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.89 | 3.83 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.09 | -3.10 | -325% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.56 | -0.23 | 1,571% |
| Returns for 10 years | -17.31 | 53.01 | -33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement