Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSSX vs SSGSX
LRSSX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSSX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R4
Price$15.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets381.85M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
LRSSX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSSX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSSX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. LRSSX (382M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSSX: SSGSX (0.47) vs LRSSX (0.03). LRSSX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSSX (10 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) and LRSSX (1.21) have similar cost to investors . LRSSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSSX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.56 vs. LRSSX (-4.76). LRSSX return over 5 years is better than : 27.96 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| LRSSX | SSGSX | LRSSX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.26 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.26 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.371 | 2.046 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 382M | 5.64B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.47 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | -1.56 | 305% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.66 | 3.97 | 570% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.96 | 22.95 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.97 | 24.71 | -158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers