Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSRX vs SSGSX
LRSRX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSRX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R3
Price$13.27
Change-$0.20 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets363.54M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.80
Change-$0.57 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.23B
LRSRX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSRX vs. SSGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSRX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.23B vs. LRSRX (364M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSRX: SSGSX (0.49) vs LRSRX (0.00). LRSRX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSRX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LRSRX (1.46) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSRX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -12.62 vs. LRSRX (-17.87). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 8.71 vs. LRSRX (8.02).
| LRSRX | SSGSX | LRSRX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.26 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 1.26 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.108 | -0.129 | 1,631% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 364M | 5.23B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.87 | -12.62 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.23 | -6.25 | -164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.02 | 8.71 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.29 | 20.45 | -231% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement