Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$13.06
Change+$0.08 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets379.49M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. LRSQX (379M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.51) vs LRSQX (0.00). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSQX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.26 vs. LRSQX (-4.53). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 29.33 vs. LRSQX (25.58).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.508 | -2.068 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 5.82B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.53 | -1.26 | 359% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.62 | 2.38 | 783% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.58 | 29.33 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -50.81 | 16.52 | -307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement