Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$13.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets374.98M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. LRSQX (375M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.51) vs LRSQX (0.00). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (17 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). LRSQX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.77 vs. LRSQX (-11.65). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 23.49 vs. LRSQX (21.76).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.659 | -2.283 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 375M | 5.73B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.65 | -8.77 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.79 | -2.14 | -692% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.76 | 23.49 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.81 | 18.39 | -271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers