Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$13.07
Change-$0.12 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets374.22M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$46.26
Change-$0.32 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.51B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.51B vs. LRSQX (374M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.47) vs LRSQX (0.00). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LRSQX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.12 vs. LRSQX (-10.60). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 30.29 vs. LRSQX (28.39).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.433 | -0.366 | 391% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 5.51B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.60 | -5.12 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.65 | 8.30 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.39 | 30.29 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.11 | 26.19 | -172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers