Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$12.96
Change+$0.06 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets364.61M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. LRSQX (365M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.48) vs LRSQX (0.00). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LRSQX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). LRSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.48 vs. LRSQX (-14.17). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.06 vs. LRSQX (15.30).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.26 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.262 | -1.034 | 219% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 365M | 5.31B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.17 | -8.48 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.71 | 1.10 | 1,431% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.30 | 18.06 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -49.43 | 18.76 | -264% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers