Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSQX vs SSGSX
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSQX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
Price$13.33
Change+$0.13 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets387.03M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$49.22
Change+$0.90 (+1.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.04B
LRSQX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSQX vs. SSGSX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSQX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.04B vs. LRSQX (387M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSQX: SSGSX (0.58) vs LRSQX (0.04). LRSQX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSQX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). LRSQX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.23). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LRSQX (42.00). LRSQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.83 vs. LRSQX (-0.56). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : -0.23 vs. LRSQX (-9.55).
| LRSQX | SSGSX | LRSQX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.23 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.23 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.538 | 8.123 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 387M | 5.04B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.58 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.56 | 3.83 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.33 | -3.10 | -204% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.55 | -0.23 | 4,217% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.80 | 53.01 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement