Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSOX vs SSGSX
LRSOX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSOX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F3
Price$20.98
Change+$0.12 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets379.49M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
LRSOX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSOX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSOX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. LRSOX (379M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSOX: SSGSX (0.51) vs LRSOX (0.20). LRSOX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSOX (8 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSOX (0.88). LRSOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSOX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSOX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). LRSOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.23 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). LRSOX return over 5 years is better than : 45.07 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| LRSOX | SSGSX | LRSOX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.26 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.26 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.224 | -2.068 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 379M | 5.82B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.51 | 40% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.23 | -1.26 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.94 | 2.38 | 1,174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.07 | 29.33 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 16.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement