Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSFX vs SSGSX
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$15.73
Change+$0.26 (+1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.05M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.21
Change+$0.63 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18B
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSFX is a Buy and SSGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.18B vs. LRSFX (372M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: SSGSX (0.48) vs LRSFX (0.16). LRSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSFX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSFX (1.06). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.68 vs. LRSFX (-16.47). LRSFX return over 5 years is better than : 7.36 vs. SSGSX (4.92).
| LRSFX | SSGSX | LRSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.193 | 0.582 | -33% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 372M | 5.18B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.48 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.47 | -13.68 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.89 | -7.65 | -155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.36 | 4.92 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | -42.00 | 17.51 | -240% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers