Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRSFX vs SSGSX
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts LRSFX vs SSGSX
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F
Price$15.21
Change+$0.07 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.08M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.95
Change+$0.15 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.31B
LRSFX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRSFX vs. SSGSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRSFX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.31B vs. LRSFX (366M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than LRSFX: SSGSX (0.48) vs LRSFX (0.16). LRSFX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: LRSFX (18 years) vs SSGSX (27 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than LRSFX (1.06). LRSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). LRSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: LRSFX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.48 vs. LRSFX (-12.35). LRSFX return over 5 years is better than : 22.25 vs. SSGSX (18.06).
| LRSFX | SSGSX | LRSFX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.26 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.934 | -1.034 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 366M | 5.31B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.48 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.35 | -8.48 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.49 | 1.10 | 1,775% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.25 | 18.06 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | -41.89 | 18.76 | -223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers