LRN
Price
$144.95
Change
+$4.27 (+3.04%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.32B
10 days until earnings call
MMS
Price
$85.18
Change
+$1.23 (+1.47%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.8B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRN vs MMS

Header iconLRN vs MMS Comparison
Open Charts LRN vs MMSBanner chart's image
Stride
Price$144.95
Change+$4.27 (+3.04%)
Volume$603.82K
Capitalization6.32B
MAXIMUS
Price$85.18
Change+$1.23 (+1.47%)
Volume$638.04K
Capitalization4.8B
LRN vs MMS Comparison Chart in %
LRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LRN vs. MMS commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRN is a Hold and MMS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (LRN: $144.95 vs. MMS: $85.18)
Brand notoriety: LRN and MMS are both not notable
LRN represents the Other Consumer Specialties, while MMS is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRN: 82% vs. MMS: 109%
Market capitalization -- LRN: $6.32B vs. MMS: $4.8B
LRN [@Other Consumer Specialties] is valued at $6.32B. MMS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry ranges from $8.85B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Specialties] industry is $1.25B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMMS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LRN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRN is a better buy in the long-term than MMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LRN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRN is a better buy in the short-term than MMS.

Price Growth

LRN (@Other Consumer Specialties) experienced а +0.26% price change this week, while MMS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Specialties industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.97%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

MMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Specialties (+0.50% weekly)

‘Other Consumer Specialties’ represents an industry that typically sells durable consumer products, but do not have a classification in another category. The products include jewelry, smoke detectors, watches, collectibles and safety products. MSA Safety (makes products which enhances the safety and health of workers and protect facility infrastructures), Matthews International (memorialization business), Fitbit (makes wireless-enabled wearable technology devices that gauge data such as the number of steps walked, heart rate, quality of sleep), and Fossil Group (makes watches and accessories) have some of the largest market caps in this group.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (+1.17% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRN($6.32B) has a higher market cap than MMS($4.8B). LRN has higher P/E ratio than MMS: LRN (24.36) vs MMS (15.83). LRN YTD gains are higher at: 39.469 vs. MMS (15.486). MMS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 648M vs. LRN (508M). LRN has more cash in the bank: 985M vs. MMS (59.8M). LRN has less debt than MMS: LRN (550M) vs MMS (1.78B). MMS has higher revenues than LRN: MMS (5.43B) vs LRN (2.41B).
LRNMMSLRN / MMS
Capitalization6.32B4.8B132%
EBITDA508M648M78%
Gain YTD39.46915.486255%
P/E Ratio24.3615.83154%
Revenue2.41B5.43B44%
Total Cash985M59.8M1,647%
Total Debt550M1.78B31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRN vs MMS: Fundamental Ratings
LRN
MMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7356
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
660
SMR RATING
1..100
4249
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1567
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MMS's Valuation (36) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRN (83) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that MMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRN’s over the last 12 months.

LRN's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMS (60) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LRN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMS’s over the last 12 months.

LRN's SMR Rating (42) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MMS (49) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LRN’s stock grew similarly to MMS’s over the last 12 months.

LRN's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as MMS (50) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LRN’s stock grew similarly to MMS’s over the last 12 months.

LRN's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MMS (67) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LRN’s stock grew somewhat faster than MMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRNMMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LRN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JHJCX23.620.19
+0.81%
JHancock ESG Large Cap Core C
OLGAX89.000.17
+0.19%
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth A
FSLCX19.51N/A
N/A
Fidelity Small Cap Stock
GAMPX13.28-0.01
-0.08%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd P
WGROX81.81-0.10
-0.12%
Wasatch Core Growth

LRN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRN has been loosely correlated with ATGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRN jumps, then ATGE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRN
1D Price
Change %
LRN100%
+3.04%
ATGE - LRN
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
LOPE - LRN
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
PRDO - LRN
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
MMS - LRN
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
BAER - LRN
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MMS has been loosely correlated with ICFI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MMS jumps, then ICFI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMS
1D Price
Change %
MMS100%
+1.47%
ICFI - MMS
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
FA - MMS
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
BRC - MMS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
BAH - MMS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
ABM - MMS
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
More