LRMR
Price
$1.77
Change
-$0.11 (-5.85%)
Updated
May 14, 02:17 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
120.05M
85 days until earnings call
TSHA
Price
$2.35
Change
+$0.02 (+0.85%)
Updated
May 14, 02:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
479.83M
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

LRMR vs TSHA

Header iconLRMR vs TSHA Comparison
Open Charts LRMR vs TSHABanner chart's image
Larimar Therapeutics
Price$1.77
Change-$0.11 (-5.85%)
Volume$2.6K
Capitalization120.05M
Taysha Gene Therapies
Price$2.35
Change+$0.02 (+0.85%)
Volume$200
Capitalization479.83M
LRMR vs TSHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
LRMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LRMR vs. TSHA commentary
May 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRMR is a Hold and TSHA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 14, 2025
Stock price -- (LRMR: $1.88 vs. TSHA: $2.34)
Brand notoriety: LRMR and TSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRMR: 97% vs. TSHA: 85%
Market capitalization -- LRMR: $120.05M vs. TSHA: $479.83M
LRMR [@Biotechnology] is valued at $120.05M. TSHA’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $479.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $295.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSHA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LRMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TSHA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both LRMR and TSHA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSHA’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LRMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • TSHA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TSHA is a better buy in the short-term than LRMR.

Price Growth

LRMR (@Biotechnology) experienced а -10.71% price change this week, while TSHA (@Biotechnology) price change was +17.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRMR is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

TSHA is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+0.95% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TSHA($480M) has a higher market cap than LRMR($120M). TSHA YTD gains are higher at: 35.260 vs. LRMR (-51.550). LRMR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -73.44M vs. TSHA (-87.95M). LRMR has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. TSHA (139M). LRMR has less debt than TSHA: LRMR (5.36M) vs TSHA (63.2M). TSHA has higher revenues than LRMR: TSHA (8.33M) vs LRMR (0).
LRMRTSHALRMR / TSHA
Capitalization120M480M25%
EBITDA-73.44M-87.95M83%
Gain YTD-51.55035.260-146%
P/E RatioN/A2.70-
Revenue08.33M-
Total Cash204M139M147%
Total Debt5.36M63.2M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRMR: Fundamental Ratings
LRMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRMRTSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LRMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSHA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA334.0715.69
+4.93%
Tesla
BTC.X104169.8100001356.851600
+1.32%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME28.390.34
+1.21%
GameStop Corp
AAPL212.932.14
+1.02%
Apple
SPY586.843.85
+0.66%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF

LRMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRMR has been loosely correlated with ACLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRMR jumps, then ACLX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRMR
1D Price
Change %
LRMR100%
-9.86%
ACLX - LRMR
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.10%
ERAS - LRMR
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.32%
SVRA - LRMR
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
IMNM - LRMR
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
RCKT - LRMR
46%
Loosely correlated
-5.50%
More

TSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSHA has been loosely correlated with SLDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TSHA jumps, then SLDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSHA
1D Price
Change %
TSHA100%
+0.86%
SLDB - TSHA
43%
Loosely correlated
-3.79%
COGT - TSHA
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.73%
NTLA - TSHA
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.69%
ALT - TSHA
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.16%
LRMR - TSHA
39%
Loosely correlated
-9.86%
More