LRLCF
Price
$433.30
Change
+$12.33 (+2.93%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
228.15B
LRLCY
Price
$85.66
Change
+$0.32 (+0.37%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
228.15B
22 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LRLCF vs LRLCY

Header iconLRLCF vs LRLCY Comparison
Open Charts LRLCF vs LRLCYBanner chart's image
L'Oreal
Price$433.30
Change+$12.33 (+2.93%)
Volume$623
Capitalization228.15B
L'Oreal
Price$85.66
Change+$0.32 (+0.37%)
Volume$71.52K
Capitalization228.15B
LRLCF vs LRLCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LRLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LRLCF vs. LRLCY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRLCF is a Hold and LRLCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LRLCF: $433.30 vs. LRLCY: $85.66)
Brand notoriety: LRLCF and LRLCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LRLCF: 184% vs. LRLCY: 64%
Market capitalization -- LRLCF: $228.15B vs. LRLCY: $228.15B
LRLCF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $228.15B. LRLCY’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $228.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $356.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $20.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LRLCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLRLCY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • LRLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LRLCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRLCF is a better buy in the long-term than LRLCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LRLCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRLCY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LRLCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • LRLCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRLCY is a better buy in the short-term than LRLCF.

Price Growth

LRLCF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -3.47% price change this week, while LRLCY (@Household/Personal Care) price change was -1.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.51%.

Reported Earning Dates

LRLCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-2.09% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRLCF($228B) and LRLCY($228B) have the same market capitalization . LRLCF (32.31) and LRLCY (31.94) have similar P/E ratio . LRLCF YTD gains are higher at: 25.259 vs. LRLCY (23.914). LRLCF (10.7B) and LRLCY (10.7B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . LRLCF (4.82B) and LRLCY (4.82B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . LRLCF (8.83B) and LRLCY (8.83B) have identical debt. LRLCF (43.8B) and LRLCY (43.8B) have equivalent revenues.
LRLCFLRLCYLRLCF / LRLCY
Capitalization228B228B100%
EBITDA10.7B10.7B100%
Gain YTD25.25923.914106%
P/E Ratio32.3131.94101%
Revenue43.8B43.8B100%
Total Cash4.82B4.82B100%
Total Debt8.83B8.83B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LRLCF vs LRLCY: Fundamental Ratings
LRLCF
LRLCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6458
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4752
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRLCF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCY (54). This means that LRLCF’s stock grew similarly to LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCF (64). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCF (95). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCY's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCF (58). This means that LRLCY’s stock grew similarly to LRLCF’s over the last 12 months.

LRLCF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as LRLCY (52). This means that LRLCF’s stock grew similarly to LRLCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LRLCFLRLCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LRLCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCSUF0.570.45
+374.92%
Focus Minerals Ltd.
PMCOF0.19N/A
+0.84%
PROSPECTOR METALS CORP.
CLRUF10.02N/A
N/A
ClimateRock
SDXOF59.86N/A
N/A
Sodexo
AIIXY36.13N/A
N/A
Aixtron SE

LRLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRLCF has been loosely correlated with LRLCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRLCF jumps, then LRLCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRLCF
1D Price
Change %
LRLCF100%
+2.93%
LRLCY - LRLCF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
BDRFY - LRLCF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
SSDOY - LRLCF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
HENOY - LRLCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
HENKY - LRLCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.27%
More

LRLCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRLCY has been loosely correlated with BDRFY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LRLCY jumps, then BDRFY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRLCY
1D Price
Change %
LRLCY100%
+0.37%
BDRFY - LRLCY
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
LRLCF - LRLCY
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.93%
HENOY - LRLCY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
HENKY - LRLCY
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
SSDOY - LRLCY
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
More