Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LRGC vs RECS
LRGC vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts LRGC vs RECS
AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF
Price$76.42
Change+$0.27 (+0.35%)
Volume$4.94K
Net Assets611.12M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.06
Change+$0.24 (+0.60%)
Volume$619.39K
Net Assets3.82B
LRGC vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LRGC vs. RECS commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRGC is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.82B vs. LRGC (611M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than LRGC: RECS (15.713) vs LRGC (13.583). LRGC was incepted earlier than RECS: LRGC (2 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than LRGC (0.39). RECS has a higher turnover LRGC (19.00) vs LRGC (19.00).
| LRGC | RECS | LRGC / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 13.583 | 15.713 | 86% |
| Net Assets | 611M | 3.82B | 16% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.15 | 260% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 49.00 | 39% |
| Yield | 0.41 | 0.62 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LRGC | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LRGC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LRGC and V have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRGC and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRGC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRGC | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| V - LRGC | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| AZO - LRGC | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
| PG - LRGC | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.23% | ||
| HD - LRGC | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| QSR - LRGC | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.87% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||