Advertisement
LRCX vs TOELF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LRCX is a StrongBuy and TOELF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LRCX’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileTOELF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- LRCX’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- TOELF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LRCX’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOELF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LRCX’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TOELF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LRCX (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -3.51% price change this week, while TOELF (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -1.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -2.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +64.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
LRCX is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-2.29% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| LRCX | TOELF | LRCX / TOELF | |
| Capitalization | 287B | 123B | 233% |
| EBITDA | 7.09B | 758B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | 34.420 | 20.170 | 171% |
| P/E Ratio | 47.25 | 35.45 | 133% |
| Revenue | 19.6B | 2.49T | 1% |
| Total Cash | 6.69B | 455B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 4.48B | N/A | - |
LRCX | TOELF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 49 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | 9 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TOELF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRCX (66) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that TOELF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRCX’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOELF (49) in the null industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOELF’s over the last 12 months.
TOELF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCX (17) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that TOELF’s stock grew similarly to LRCX’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOELF (38) in the null industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOELF’s over the last 12 months.
LRCX's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as TOELF (19) in the null industry. This means that LRCX’s stock grew similarly to TOELF’s over the last 12 months.
| LRCX | TOELF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 8 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 66% | 16 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 72% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GOVI | 27.42 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Years Trs ETF | |||
| DVIN | 28.93 | N/A | N/A |
| WEBs Industrials XLI Defined Vol ETF | |||
| HYXF | 47.17 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| iShares ESG Advanced Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
| XIMR | 30.97 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & Prm Inc ETF - Mar | |||
| VT | 145.61 | -0.54 | -0.37% |
| Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | |||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -3.12% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -3.16% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -13.42% | ||
More | ||||
TOELF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TOELF has been closely correlated with TOELY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TOELF jumps, then TOELY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOELF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOELF | 100% | +1.58% | ||
| TOELY - TOELF | 74% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| DSCSY - TOELF | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| AMAT - TOELF | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.96% | ||
| LRCX - TOELF | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| LSRCY - TOELF | 46% Loosely correlated | -4.17% | ||
More | ||||