LQWDF
Price
$1.25
Change
+$0.11 (+9.65%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
34.52M
QLYS
Price
$136.66
Change
+$1.30 (+0.96%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.93B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LQWDF vs QLYS

Header iconLQWDF vs QLYS Comparison
Open Charts LQWDF vs QLYSBanner chart's image
LQWD TECHNOLOGIES
Price$1.25
Change+$0.11 (+9.65%)
Volume$60.66K
Capitalization34.52M
Qualys
Price$136.66
Change+$1.30 (+0.96%)
Volume$232.07K
Capitalization4.93B
LQWDF vs QLYS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LQWDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LQWDF vs. QLYS commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQWDF is a Hold and QLYS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LQWDF: $1.25 vs. QLYS: $136.66)
Brand notoriety: LQWDF and QLYS are both not notable
LQWDF represents the Packaged Software, while QLYS is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LQWDF: 89% vs. QLYS: 71%
Market capitalization -- LQWDF: $34.52M vs. QLYS: $4.93B
LQWDF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $34.52M. QLYS’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $4.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $308B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.8T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LQWDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQLYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LQWDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QLYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the long-term than LQWDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LQWDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QLYS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LQWDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QLYS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QLYS is a better buy in the short-term than LQWDF.

Price Growth

LQWDF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.58% price change this week, while QLYS (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.36%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

QLYS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.13% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLYS($4.93B) has a higher market cap than LQWDF($34.5M). QLYS YTD gains are higher at: -2.539 vs. LQWDF (-16.107). QLYS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 214M vs. LQWDF (-2.12M). QLYS has more cash in the bank: 370M vs. LQWDF (1.33M). QLYS has higher revenues than LQWDF: QLYS (637M) vs LQWDF (8.18K).
LQWDFQLYSLQWDF / QLYS
Capitalization34.5M4.93B1%
EBITDA-2.12M214M-1%
Gain YTD-16.107-2.539634%
P/E RatioN/A27.22-
Revenue8.18K637M0%
Total Cash1.33M370M0%
Total DebtN/A55.3M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQWDF vs QLYS: Fundamental Ratings
LQWDF
QLYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
212
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
9524
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4554
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10049
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QLYS's Valuation (80) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LQWDF (92) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

QLYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as LQWDF (100) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew similarly to LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

QLYS's SMR Rating (24) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for LQWDF (95) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew significantly faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

LQWDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as QLYS (54) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that LQWDF’s stock grew similarly to QLYS’s over the last 12 months.

QLYS's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LQWDF (100) in the null industry. This means that QLYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than LQWDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LQWDFQLYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LQWDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QLYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LIDOX9.850.08
+0.82%
Lord Abbett International Value F3
JHJIX24.760.11
+0.45%
JHancock ESG Large Cap Core I
CWGFX74.520.31
+0.42%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc F1
TGIRX32.990.13
+0.40%
Thornburg International Equity R6
WBIGX30.130.01
+0.03%
William Blair International Growth N

LQWDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LQWDF and EVH have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LQWDF and EVH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQWDF
1D Price
Change %
LQWDF100%
+9.65%
EVH - LQWDF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
XYZ - LQWDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
EB - LQWDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.24%
QLYS - LQWDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
DCBO - LQWDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.75%
More

QLYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLYS has been loosely correlated with TENB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLYS jumps, then TENB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QLYS
1D Price
Change %
QLYS100%
+0.96%
TENB - QLYS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
CCSI - QLYS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
DJCO - QLYS
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
EVCM - QLYS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
PCTY - QLYS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More