LQMT
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
128.42M
WOR
Price
$54.40
Change
+$1.61 (+3.05%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.71B
85 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LQMT vs WOR

Header iconLQMT vs WOR Comparison
Open Charts LQMT vs WORBanner chart's image
Liquidmetal Technologies
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$804.67K
Capitalization128.42M
Worthington Enterprises
Price$54.40
Change+$1.61 (+3.05%)
Volume$833.53K
Capitalization2.71B
LQMT vs WOR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LQMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LQMT vs. WOR commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LQMT is a Hold and WOR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (LQMT: $0.14 vs. WOR: $54.40)
Brand notoriety: LQMT and WOR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Metal Fabrication industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LQMT: 171% vs. WOR: 312%
Market capitalization -- LQMT: $128.42M vs. WOR: $2.71B
LQMT [@Metal Fabrication] is valued at $128.42M. WOR’s [@Metal Fabrication] market capitalization is $2.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Metal Fabrication] industry ranges from $56.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Metal Fabrication] industry is $2.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LQMT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWOR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LQMT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WOR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WOR is a better buy in the long-term than LQMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LQMT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WOR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LQMT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WOR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LQMT is a better buy in the short-term than WOR.

Price Growth

LQMT (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а +4.48% price change this week, while WOR (@Metal Fabrication) price change was -10.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

WOR is expected to report earnings on Dec 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Metal Fabrication (+0.77% weekly)

The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WOR($2.71B) has a higher market cap than LQMT($128M). LQMT YTD gains are higher at: 229.412 vs. WOR (36.998).
LQMTWORLQMT / WOR
Capitalization128M2.71B5%
EBITDA-3.21MN/A-
Gain YTD229.41236.998620%
P/E RatioN/A247.27-
Revenue1.02MN/A-
Total Cash13.6MN/A-
Total DebtN/A326M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LQMT vs WOR: Fundamental Ratings
LQMT
WOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9140
SMR RATING
1..100
9569
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1003
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LQMT's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as WOR (90) in the Steel industry. This means that LQMT’s stock grew similarly to WOR’s over the last 12 months.

WOR's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LQMT (91) in the null industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LQMT’s over the last 12 months.

WOR's SMR Rating (69) in the Steel industry is in the same range as LQMT (95) in the null industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew similarly to LQMT’s over the last 12 months.

LQMT's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as WOR (62) in the Steel industry. This means that LQMT’s stock grew similarly to WOR’s over the last 12 months.

WOR's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for LQMT (100) in the null industry. This means that WOR’s stock grew significantly faster than LQMT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LQMTWOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LQMT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HMCLX15.330.16
+1.05%
Harbor Mid Cap Institutional
MSERX9.910.10
+1.02%
MassMutual Small Cap Growth Eq R4
VCKSX10.520.08
+0.77%
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth C
ATHDX31.200.21
+0.68%
American Century Heritage R6
GLCUX38.610.14
+0.36%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6

LQMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LQMT and WOR have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LQMT and WOR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LQMT
1D Price
Change %
LQMT100%
-2.03%
WOR - LQMT
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
MLI - LQMT
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
MUEL - LQMT
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
TYEKF - LQMT
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
TKAMY - LQMT
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
More

WOR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WOR has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WOR jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WOR
1D Price
Change %
WOR100%
+3.05%
MLI - WOR
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
GFF - WOR
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
CODI - WOR
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
MATW - WOR
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
RYI - WOR
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.07%
More